An introduction of “unsustainable” activities list by the European Commission could standardize negative screening by investors and shift capital flows. Negative or exclusionary screening remains the most widely applied ESG strategy in the financial sector, however there is no standardized approach and in a data comparison, only half of fossil fuel companies were part of the all lists studied due to variations in data coverage. In practice, many large investors are unlikely to make immediate changes to screen approaches, but will use these disclosures as a starting point. Brown taxonomy has gained support from financial market regulators like the ECB, Band of England, and Sweden’s Riksbank, eventually influencing the application of penal or “malus” capital charges.
Link to resourceShare this
Sectors: Buildings, Finance
Country / Region: Europe
Tags: economic capital, fossil energy, Industry Regulators, Institutional Investors, Investors, National Regulators, regulators, SMARTER, Supranational Regulators, sustainable livelihoods approachesIn 4 user collections: Green Home Investment Platform – Industry Regulators , Green Home Investment Platform – National Regulators , Green Home Investment Platform – Supranational Regulators , Green Home Investment Platform – Institutional Investors
Knowledge Object: Web Resource
Author: David McNeil, Tatiana Kordyukova, Mervyn Tang